扫描学姐二维码

领取考研资料

领取考研资料
领取考研资料

雷哥考研 > 题库 > 2020年管理类联考英语(二)真题卷 > 阅读理解A

Text 3 Madrid was hailed as a public health beacon last November when it rolled out ambitious restrictions on the most polluting cars. Seven months and one election day later, a new conservative city council suspended enforcement of the clean air zone, a first step toward its possible demise. Mayor José Luis Martínez-Almeida made opposition to the zone a centrepiece of his election campaign, despite its success in improving air quality. A judge has now overruled the city’s decision to stop levying fines, ordering them reinstated. But with legal battles ahead, the zone’s future looks uncertain at best. Among other weaknesses, the measures cities must employ when left to tackle dirty air on their own are politically contentious, and therefore vulnerable. That’s because they inevitably put the costs of cleaning the air on to individual drivers—who must pay fees or buy better vehicles—rather than on to the car manufacturers whose cheating is the real cause of our toxic pollution. It’s not hard to imagine a similar reversal happening in London. The new ultra-low emission zone (Ulez) is likely to be a big issue in next year’s mayoral election. And if Sadiq Khan wins and extends it to the North and South Circular roads in 2021 as he intends, it is sure to spark intense opposition from the far larger number of motorists who will then be affected. It’s not that measures such as London’s Ulez are useless. Far from it. Local officials are using the levers that are available to them to safeguard residents’ health in the face of a serious threat. The zones do deliver some improvements to air quality, and the science tells us that means real health benefits—fewer heart attacks, strokes and premature births, less cancer, dementia and asthma. Fewer untimely deaths. But mayors and councilors can only do so much about a problem that is far bigger than any one city or town. They are acting because national governments —Britain’s and others across Europe – have failed to do so. Restrictions that keep highly polluting cars out of certain areas—city centers, “school streets”, even individual roads – are a response to the absence of a larger effort to properly enforce existing regulations and require auto companies to bring their vehicles into compliance. Wales has introduced special low speed limits to minimize pollution. We’re doing everything but insist that manufacturers clean up their cars.

31. Which of the following is true about Madrid’s clean air zone?

正确答案:B

  • 雷哥网解析
  • 网友解析
【选项】[A]效果仍存疑 [B]它的命运尚未决定 [C] 它需要更严格的执行 [D]它遭到了法官的反对 【解析】细节题。根据题目中的关键词“Madrid’s clean air zone”可以定位到第二段;“despite its success in improving air quality( 尽管该区在改善空气质量方面取得了成功)”可知A选项“其效果值得怀疑”错误;“A judge has now overruled the city’s decision to stop levying fines(一名法官否决了该市停止征收罚款的决定,下令恢复罚款)”与D 选项“It has been opposed by a judge.( 这遭到了法官的反对)”不符,D错误;该段最后一句话说“But with legal battles ahead, the zone’s future looks uncertain at best.(但随着法律斗争的到来,欧元区的未来往好了说也不确定。)”可以,答案B. “Its fate is yet to decide. 它的命运尚未决定。”正确,而C项在文章中并未提及。

题目讨论 0条评论)

用户头像
提交

    近期活动

    领取资料
    关闭
    扫码领取考研体验课+院校资料
    扫码领取考研体验课+院校资料